Real Military People (not the Fake Armchair Warriors Posting in This Section)?
Armchair and Blog-Intros
An armchair is a comfortable chair with armrests designed for relaxation or reading. It is a perfect seat for spending cozy evenings at home or enjoying a good book. An armchair can add a touch of elegance and comfort to any home decor.
On the other hand, a blog-intro is the introduction section of a blog post. It should be written in such a way that it captures the attention of the reader, entices them to read further, and gives an overview of what the blog post is all about. The blog-intro is usually the first impression for visitors, and it can make or break the success of the blog post.
Both an armchair and a blog-intro have a common characteristic, which is the ability to provide comfort and relaxation. Comfortably sitting in an armchair and reading a well-written blog post can be an indulgent pleasure that many people enjoy.
In conclusion, whether it's an armchair or a blog-intro, both provide comfort and relaxation to readers. So, next time you're looking for a way to unwind and relax, why not curl up in an armchair or read a great blog-intro?
Not in modern times. I would guess that Patton would not be able to find the personal restraint to avoid the collateral damage or obtain the level of cultural sensitivity required for counterinsurgency operations. I've read a good deal about Patton and hence, I do not think he would perform effectively on the modern battlefield. He was a renaissance soldier and romanticized the battles of yesteryear. Our political goals are too intertwined with military strategy these days. That being said, if our goal was to simply destroy everything in our path, then hell yeah I would serve under him! I am an Army aviator. If he ever needed a lift, I would be honored. Carry On!
1. Are there any armchair political experts that want to give me their views on how the riots in Egypt will?
What do you think? It's a commodity and there is a crisis in the middle east. Do you think speculators are going to let that go to waste?
2. What is the difference between a theoretical physicist and an armchair physicist?
An armchair physicist is one of those people who smugly inform you that their scheme to get from here to Andromeda by a sleighride through a wormhole on a spaceship built like a ferris-wheel is validated by their smug awareness that "Pluto is not a planet, you know."
3. Are the Jehovah's Witnesses on Yahoo Answers Armchair Warriors?
There are only about 20 or so Witnesses that i see regularly on Yahoo answers. Does that count as "many"? do you seriously believe any of the junk you just spewed out? Seriously? I really hope that you are not that deluded. Oh, and please if you will show where in any of our publications it: " teaches its members to have a fanatical war mentality when it comes to people who disagree with you" Thanks --------- How did any of those answer my question? --------- Which article are you saying "Teaches its members to have a fanatical war mentality when it comes to people who disagree with you"? We had just studied those articles very recently, and i still have my copy in my hand, so which one are you trying to refer to? Or are you talking about the article on Jehu? Is this the "teaching" you are talking about? These subtle little snippets that you can take far out of context? .
4. Is there a term to describe irritating, useless 'armchair/outside/blind advice givers'?
There are a few words I can think of: They are being "presumptuous." They are giving "unsolicited advice." They are offering "platitudes." Depending how they say it, they could be "pompous bores."
5. As an armchair General, would you have disobeyed Hitler and broke out of Stalingrad in second half of 1942?
To disobey would have dire consequences. Trying a breakout late in the battle would certainly fail. When first given command, this battle would not have been as costly if Hitler would have stayed west of Stalingrad, and held there.
6. Alright boys and girls, let's be armchair coaches tonight.?
I think you gotta ride Johnson right now because he's playing hot obviously. I think this will motivate the Flower to play harder and more intense. Haha yeah that's obviously what Pittsburgh needs to do, trade Stall Malkin etc.
7. What is the most iconic model of armchair?
Designers are divided about this question. There are hundreds of chairs that, because of design aesthetics and functionality, have earned the title of "icon".Top of mind, my answer is the Aemes lounge chair and ottoman because it is warm and comfortable, like a mitt cradling a baseball (the inspiration for the design). However, the bulk of the chair only allows us to use this where there is plenty of space for free movement and swiveling, and for the overall appreciation of the chair design.Eero Saarinen's Womb Chair has an almost similar design, although more light and airy, and without the swivel, so it looks great even on tight spaces.What is the most iconic model of armchair?.
8. Armchair music critics! Time for your professional opinions!?
I've heard most of them. Beethoven 4 - 7 Beethoven 5 - 9.5 Mozart 20 - 8 Mozart 21 - 10 (LOVE IT!) Mozart 27 - 6.5 (not a big fan) Brahms 1 - 8 (the finale reminds me of something...) Brahms 2 - 7.5 (not as good as Brahms 1, but...) Bartok 2 - 6 Bartok 3 - 7 Rachmaninoff 1 - 8 Rachmaninoff 2 - 8 Rachmaninoff 3 - 9.5 (astounding ending!) Rachmaninoff 4 - 8 Rachmaninoff Rhapsody - 7.5 Scriabin - 6 (err...not a big fan) Khachaturian - 7 Macdowell 2 - 7 Ravel (Left-hand) - 9 (astonishing!) Ravel - 8 Liszt 1 - 8 Liszt 2 - 7 Prokofiev 1 - 7 Prokofiev 2 - 5.5 (do not really like it) Prokofiev 3 - 9 (love it!) Shostakovich 2 - 8 Grieg 1 - 9.5 (I love it!) Hummel 3 - ? Medtner 1 - ? Medtner 2 - ? Medtner 3 - ? Chopin 1 - 10 (perhaps my most favorite, especially third movement) Chopin 2 - 8 Dvorak - 8 Saint-Saens 2 - 8 Saint-Saens 5 - 7 Stenhammer 1 - ? Stenhammer 2 - ? Busoni - 8 Pierne - ? Tveitt 4 'Northern Lights' - ? Ralph Vaughan Williams 1 - ? Amy Beach 1 - ? Moszkowski - 6.75 Tchaikovsky 1 - 8 Tchaikovsky 2 - 7 Tchaikovsky 3 - 6 Scharwenka 1 - (?) EDIT: 4.5 (listened to it, did not really care for it) Scharwenka 4 - (?) EDIT: 4.5 (same) Rautaavara 1 - ? Rautaavara 2 - ? Rautaavara 3 - ? Rubinstein 4 - 4.5 (not that great, but I give credit for the work) Mendelssohn 2 - 7 Thalberg - ? Barber - 7 I did find some unusual names here, I will tune in on YouTube and listen to those concertos and other works by these odd composers whom I never heard of! Best, M Edit: Can 'ya add Beethoven's First Piano Concerto? (9, love it)
The armchair is a comfortable piece of furniture that has been popular for centuries. It derives its name from its design, which typically includes upholstered arms that provide a convenient resting place for the user's arms. Armchairs are often used in living rooms, studies, or libraries, where their comfort and elegance can be appreciated. They come in a variety of styles and can be made from a wide range of materials, from traditional wood and leather to modern plastics and metals.
In the age of blogs and online publishing, the concept of the armchair has gained a new significance. Bloggers often use armchairs as a metaphor for their approach to writing, suggesting that they are observing the world from a comfortable, settled position and offering their readers a unique perspective on life. The term "armchair critic" is also frequently used to describe someone who offers opinions and judgments from a detached, uninvolved position.
However, it's important to remember that armchair conclusions can be misleading or incomplete. Just because someone has a comfortable or privileged position doesn't necessarily mean their opinions are valid or accurate. As readers, we need to be aware of the biases and limitations of armchair viewpoints and seek out diverse perspectives to gain a fuller understanding of the world around us.
